Skip to Navigation
Home
Home : Article Library : Cycle Helments: A Duty to Wear? :

Conclusion

Conclusion

37.It is suggested that it is neither right nor wrong for a cyclist to wear or not wear a helmet. It should be a matter of personal choice leaving the blame to lie with the person or persons responsible for the collision.

Contents

  • About CDF
  • Advice for cyclists
  • Article Library
    • Cycle Helmets and Contributory Negligence
    • Cycle Helmets and the Law
    • Cycle Lighting
    • Cycling Against the Car Culture
    • Cyclists and Liability
    • On the legality of London's Critical Mass
    • Cycle Helments: A Duty to Wear?
      • Introduction
      • Contributory Negligence
      • The Authorities
      • Smith v Finch Reasoning
      • The Safety of Cycling
      • Distraction
      • Risk Compensation
      • Evidence
      • Conclusion
    • Kotula v EDF PLC, Morrison Utility Ltd & Birch Ltd- contributory negligence, cycle paths and pavements
    • Smith v. Finch, Jorgensen v. Moore- Reviews of cases involving cycle helmets and contributory negligence
  • Support CDF
  • Seeking CDF support
  • Links
  • News
  • Contact
  • How to donate to CDF

Start fundraising with JustGiving

Advice for cyclists

  • What to do if you've been in a crash
  • Red lights and advanced stop lines
  • Riding on the pavement
  • One-way streets
  • Cycle Helmets and the Law
CDF is a registered charity, number 1108037, and a Company Limited by Guarantee, registered number 4787626
© Cyclists’ Defence Fund | Contact | About | Site by Fonant